2 Comments
User's avatar
Rainbow Roxy's avatar

Regarding the topic of the article, while I appreciate the wisdom of George Washington Carver's small experiments and steady progress, I wonder if this gentle cadence is always practicall for the demands of a modern CEO though you've certainly highlighted a truly insightful historical figure.

Expand full comment
Warren Wojnowski's avatar

Roxy, I really appreciate this question because it gets to the heart of why Carver’s approach still matters in a modern CEO’s world of speed and complexity.

The cadence *is* gentle.

But the **mechanism underneath it is ruthless**: one small experiment that produces a real signal before noon.

Most CEOs aren’t struggling because they lack big plans.

They’re struggling because their days get swallowed by demands before anything meaningful becomes *visible*. That’s exactly why Carver’s method works, not as a slowdown, but as a stabilizer.

The experiment is deliberately tiny so it can survive interruptions, context-switching, and decision fatigue.

The *output* is what matters: a clearer handoff, a tighter process, a faster explanation
 something the team can actually use today.

In that sense, the cadence isn’t about being slower.

It’s about being **non-negotiably effective** in the middle of the chaos.

But I love that you raised this because the tension between “gentle” and “practical” is exactly the tightrope modern leaders walk every day.

Expand full comment